- Joined
- Dec 3, 2019
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 44
- Points
- 58
I'm not interested in your insults; all you've done is bluster without providing any credible evidence. You haven't backed up your original claims with even questionable sources, which I might have expected. It's clear that no material exists to justify labeling the following organizations as "most corrupt":
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which is dedicated to tracking and combating hate groups, including successfully pushing for the KKK to be banned from platforms like PayPal.
The Anti-Defamation League, which speaks for itself.
The Wall Street Journal, known for tackling controversial subjects and reporting honestly on key issues, often against popular opinion.
Govinfo.gov, which is a legitimate government resource—put away the conspiracy theories.
It seems evident that:
A) You may not be familiar with these publications. B) You’re employing debate tactics reminiscent of Trump, relying on attacks rather than informed arguments, showing a lack of understanding of the very topics you’re disputing. C) Possibly all of the above.
Your assumptions about me are completely off. I'm likely older and more experienced than you, and thus better informed.
As for being “unnecessarily aggressive,” that label stands. It takes a certain mindset to react so intensely over a factual statement, making yourself look foolish in the process.
It’s also ironic that you’re accusing others of spreading propaganda and hoaxes while defending a platform known for such content.
For further reading, consider these sources:
The Huffington Post on Gab
The Associated Press on related issues
Mother Jones
NPR on tech firms and far-right websites
I could go on, but I think that’s enough for now.
You're acting really arrogant, like your education makes you superior. Maybe Reddit's a better place for that kind of attitude.