Have a question about replicating ads

[Reveluris]

I have thoroughly examined several replica ads and their corresponding websites, which has left me with some perplexing questions.

Question #1: Ad Creative I observed that these replica ads featured bold and visually striking creatives, often incorporating logos such as LV, GG, and others. Surprisingly, they did not mention any brand names in the ad text. I'm curious to understand how these ads managed to pass Facebook's review process without being flagged.

Question #2: Landing Page All of these replica ads were, understandably, using cloaked landing pages. However, what surprised me was that both the safe pages (presumably the initial pages users land on) and the money pages (where conversions occur) had pixel codes installed. The pixel code essentially parses the entire page content and transfers it to Facebook, and it cannot be cloaked. Given this, I'm puzzled as to why Facebook didn't ban these ads and their associated landing pages.

If anyone can shed light on these matters, I would greatly appreciate your insights. Thank you.

 

[DonaldMaid]

Perhaps it's because they avoided using brand names in the ad copy text. Even though the logos are recognizable, they might not be trademarked, avoiding detection by Facebook's automated systems.