Have a question about replicating ads

[Reveluris]

I have thoroughly examined several replica ads and their corresponding websites, which has left me with some perplexing questions.

Question #1: Ad Creative I observed that these replica ads featured bold and visually striking creatives, often incorporating logos such as LV, GG, and others. Surprisingly, they did not mention any brand names in the ad text. I'm curious to understand how these ads managed to pass Facebook's review process without being flagged.

Question #2: Landing Page All of these replica ads were, understandably, using cloaked landing pages. However, what surprised me was that both the safe pages (presumably the initial pages users land on) and the money pages (where conversions occur) had pixel codes installed. The pixel code essentially parses the entire page content and transfers it to Facebook, and it cannot be cloaked. Given this, I'm puzzled as to why Facebook didn't ban these ads and their associated landing pages.

If anyone can shed light on these matters, I would greatly appreciate your insights. Thank you.

 

[DonaldMaid]

Perhaps it's because they avoided using brand names in the ad copy text. Even though the logos are recognizable, they might not be trademarked, avoiding detection by Facebook's automated systems.

 

[Finnwarz]

Logos typically don't trigger review bots, and the pixel doesn’t scan the entire site. It primarily focuses on site tags, headings, and similar elements, right? Even if it did scan the whole site, people frequently use pixels on monetized sites without facing bans.

 

[Reveluris]

Logos typically don't trigger review bots, and the pixel doesn’t scan the entire site. It primarily focuses on site tags, headings, and similar elements, right? Even if it did scan the whole site, people frequently use pixels on monetized sites without facing bans.

I analyzed the pixel's request, and it captures the entire page, including product names, images, and even reviews, all of which get sent to Facebook. Some discussions suggest that the pixel data is mainly used for analytics, not for content review.

 

[Finnwarz]

Some discussions suggest that the pixel data is mainly used for analytics, not for content review.

"Yes, that seems logical."

 

[HotSport]

It's only an icon, so it won't trigger a ban from FB. Pixels don't influence FB's scanning process.

 

[Catec]

Could you share a website where I can learn more?

 

[Reveluris]

Perhaps it's because they avoided using brand names in the ad copy text. Even though the logos are recognizable, they might not be trademarked, avoiding detection by Facebook's automated systems.

So the creative should be fine as long as it doesn't include the brand name in text?

 

[Reveluris]

It's only an icon, so it won't trigger a ban from FB. Pixels don't influence FB's scanning process.

Alright, I was concerned earlier because those codes send all the details from the money page.

 

[Reveluris]

Could you share a website where I can learn more?

Of course, please send me a private message.

 

[DevWolfie]

Of course, please send me a private message.

It seems that many of our creatives are being rejected, particularly ads for replica clothing brands like Nike and Hugo Boss. We've noticed that similar ads are running on Instagram without issue. Do you have any tips on how to get around these rejections? Any tricks or strategies to consider?

 

[Mitzios]

I've been selling replica bags and watches for several years. Initially, Google Merchant Center (GMC) was the best option for these products, but recently Google started banning accounts. I've since shifted to search ads and social media marketing. For social media marketing, I use Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok ads, which have never been rejected. I feature brands like Rolex and Omega directly in my videos.

 

[Catec]

I've been selling replica bags and watches for several years. Initially, Google Merchant Center (GMC) was the best option for these products, but recently Google started banning accounts. I've since shifted to search ads and social media marketing. For social media marketing, I use Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok ads, which have never been rejected. I feature brands like Rolex and Omega directly in my videos.

How have you managed to avoid rejection and bans on your social media accounts?

 

[DevWolfie]

I've been selling replica bags and watches for several years. Initially, Google Merchant Center (GMC) was the best option for these products, but recently Google started banning accounts. I've since shifted to search ads and social media marketing. For social media marketing, I use Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok ads, which have never been rejected. I feature brands like Rolex and Omega directly in my videos.

How do you create these videos? Do you use transitions or show the product from a distance?

 

[Mitzios]

How do you create these videos? Do you use transitions or show the product from a distance?

My supplier provides images and videos and handles the shooting. I just make a few changes to the videos and it's ready to go.

 

[Mitzios]

How have you managed to avoid rejection and bans on your social media accounts?

I'm not sure where you're having trouble. My supplier provides images and videos, which I use directly. I'm running marketing campaigns on TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram, and everything is going well.

 

[WizKlug]

Have you tried using hidden features like blurring images or videos? I’ve been doing that, and everything has been running smoothly for the past two months.

Alternatively, you could explore ways to bypass Facebook's policies. I’d need more details about the issues you're encountering to offer more specific advice.

 

[Piluen]

I’m thrilled you posted this guide—it's an amazing resource!

Thank you! I’m always happy to help.

 

[WeirdHello]

It’s not a ban, just an icon in the ad creative.

 

[Bracell]

It partly depends on how strong the account is.